Is it philosophical, is it quite allowable, to assume without evidence from fossil plants that the family or any of the genera was once larger and wide spread? and occupied a continuous area?
在没有化石植物证据的情况下,假定植物科或任何属曾经是更大、分布更广的,这是合乎哲学的吗?占据了一个连续的区域?
标签
Plants
Philosophical
Evidence
Occupied